Greg Kurtzer

Open strategic review of RLC/RLK identity + upstream binding (Dirty Frag triggered)

Saturday 5/9 in #department-heads, in immediate response to Justin's Dirty Frag status table and Nathan's note about CIQ patches being shared with the RESF, Peter announced he wants the leadership team to take up a strategic question next week: what recurring vulnerabilities imply about CIQ's kernel posture, how tightly to bind to upstream, how to work with the RESF, and what it means going forward to be RLC and RLK. Aimed at framing input for the mid-to-late June LA in-person product-strategy session with Bjorn and Greg.

May 12

Commit engineering to vuln-handling infra/automation at Leadership Roundtable

At the 5/11 Leadership Roundtable, Peter accepted an explicit action item to prioritize vulnerability-response infrastructure and automation work in engineering, and to update Chris Baek as the interim process owner. The commitment converts the 5/8 internal-to-engineering commitment (build/test infra to eliminate reactive interrupts) into a cross-functional commitment with Bjorn, Greg, Chris, and Lindsay in the room.

May 12

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

Prioritize build/test infrastructure to eliminate reactive engineering interrupts

After Dirty Frag CVE took Linux engineering offline for 24 hours, Peter committed to prioritize building robust build/test infrastructure as the proactive response. Told Brady/Brian this requires Product leadership to de-prioritize other work to make room. Surfaced publicly in #department-heads thread asking how to structure infra for the new normal of AI-assisted exploit cadence.

May 8

Senior leadership candidate engagement: open to talk, not under pressure, will not give away the kingdom

On the senior leadership candidate Greg/Bjorn surfaced (described by Bjorn as a bit all over the place and by Greg as starting like she is that much of a gift to us), Peter took a disciplined position: happy to talk, would like another senior person, but not feeling pressure right now and will not concede equity/scope/title to land her. Also flagged: expects steady-state of senior candidate flow for a while.

May 7

PPL is being misused — push Bjorn to realign it to strategic priorities

The Product Priority List has drifted from a strategic-priority list (epic-level) into a granular project tracker, obscuring strategic priorities (RLCAI on Spark buried at #88) and creating bottlenecks (Ollama package delayed to May 15). Peters position: PPL must return to defining company strategy at epic level; granular tasks belong in JIRA. Will engage Bjorn directly to realign — this is the framing decision; the implementation is the negotiation with Bjorn.

May 4

Three-tier Rakuten kernel proposal — 8.10 preferred, 8.6 sustaining, $800k-$1M PS for full 8.6

Push Rakuten to migrate RLC 8.6 to 8.10. Three-tier proposal: (1) preferred — full support on 8.10 with CIQ vendor coordination to accelerate hardware recertification; (2) alternative — sustaining support on 8.6 with no new patches/backports (security risk on Rakuten); (3) PS engagement — $800k-$1M/year to fund two dedicated kernel engineers for full 8.6 support, framed explicitly as Professional Services cost not mainline engineering. June renewal is the forcing function. The original handshake-pricing deal with Tarek is void.

May 4

Everfox: require ~$2M front-loaded year-one payment, reject back-loaded $600k structure

Peter is requiring a large upfront payment ($2M floor with the proposal team; $4-6M float with Greg) for the new Everfox custom work (legacy CPU support, custom desktop) and rejecting the back-loaded $600k year-one structure. The $20M/10-year deal will be restructured to front-load payments, potentially by reducing total contract value if needed. CIQ will not absorb non-reusable engineering work without immediate funding.

May 4

Ship CIQ kernel patch with extra fix; contribute upstream; race to be first/best on CVE response

Linux kernel CVE response: CIQ shipping 10 fixes vs CentOS Stream's 9 (CIQ found and is fixing an extra issue related to the CVE). Extra commit submitted upstream to centos-stream and acknowledged for inclusion. CIQ pushing to be first EL distro to release, with primary goal of customer reassurance and secondary goal of public proof point that CIQ contributes to security and is large enough to serve big customers. Also pushing patches to RLC kernels as fallback in case RH doesn't move quickly.

May 1

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

Manage Wesley via Greg; set boat-anchor trigger with Chris (preserve optionality)

In the Chris W 1:1, Peter decided to manage Wesley's performance situation through his Greg relationship rather than moving Wesley onto a PIP or active weekly-1:1 performance track like Cole and Thomas Chin. Assessment: Wesley is capable but slow, requires handholding, won't operate at senior/principal level, but is not a net negative. Chris asked to proactively flag if Wesley becomes a boat anchor on team productivity — that is the threshold for escalation.

Apr 18

Core42: pivot from Fuzzball sale to full-stack compliance partnership

After the Core42 Tech Dive Part 2 surfaced Core42 wants a single OS vendor for their full UAE compliance stack (NIST 800-53, BIS, IDAM, physical security) across three EOY-2026 GPU clusters, Peter immediately convened an internal Impromptu Zoom to reposition the opportunity. CIQ will propose a comprehensive partnership framing CIQ as the only group that can provide all requirements, with RLC Pro Hardened + Fuzzball + Ascender as the core stack and partners filling the remaining ~20%. Consultative play: CIQ will advise Core42 on which requirements in Eric Grundstrom's doc would cause unacceptable performance degradation vs. which can be met. Nathan to draft the proposal doc by EOD Saturday so CIQ can deliver an answer by Monday.

Apr 18

Escalated Dieter/RASF urgency to Greg publicly — secured EOW commitment

Publicly escalated Dieters stress and lack of RESF authority in #distinguished-leaders (When are we actioning Dieter? Hes super stressed and feeling unsupported), forcing Greg to commit End of week is my target on finalizing the RASF.

Apr 17

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

Committed CIQ Engineering Resources to Unblock RESF

Committed CIQ engineering resources (specifically Max Spevack) to unblock RESF, positioning RESF health as critical to CIQ success. Committed to asking Nathan to prioritize providing new AWS contacts for Leigh to bypass stalled Duncan access. Directed Chris to lock down internal-rasf Slack channel for Leigh's weekly write-ups. Clarified Max's role as Chief Architect for Everything Linux focused on upstream health and AI-automated CVE remediation. Agreed Brian's value is limited to admin tasks — Leigh will communicate this assessment to Greg.

Apr 15

Set Sales Scope Discipline on Nokia Opportunity

In MPDM with Adam Jackson, Bjorn, Greg, and Jonathon, set firm boundaries on product scope for the Nokia deal. CIQ should sell what it has and is good at, not build custom solutions to close individual deals. The bar for adding new capabilities is company-level strategic pivot territory — not deal-level customization. Stated 'enough money is a LOT' and 'its not going to be for another 500k, or just to close the deal.'

Apr 15

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

Shaped Interview Panel with Veto Condition for Performance Engineering Hire

When Greg wanted to add Cedric to the interview panel and reduce from 5 to 4 interviewers, agreed Bjorn could be dropped but set a condition: a NO from Max or Peter must count as a veto.

Apr 11

Set Lab-to-Production Boundary — Nothing Ships Without Engineering Productization

Established with Bjorn that nothing from Greg's Innovation Group/Lab (Cedric) goes directly to production. Everything must pass through Engineering for productization, validation, and integration with build/signing pipelines. CIQ does nothing with RLC-Performant until the lab produces something viable.

Apr 11

Defended Global Prioritization Model with Per-Team Computed Views

Convinced Greg that product prioritization must remain a single global list, not grouped by team. Agreed to add a computed property showing priority within each team for visibility. Fuzzball was reprioritized into top 20 in Exec meeting; Greg's remaining concern about Fuzzball not being high enough was resolved via the global+computed-property approach.

Apr 11

NVIDIA Partnership - Resource Commitment for Grace Vera Patch Support

Committed to assessing headcount needs for NVIDIA Grace Vera patch support — both for the first 6 months and then ongoing. Forwarded NVIDIA patch list to Nathan for SWAG assessment. Nathan estimated 3-6 months for RLC, faster for CLK 6.18. Communicated requirements to Scott Hara: hardware access, test suites, functional and performance targets.

Apr 9

RESF Restructure - Confirmed Proceeding Despite Greg's Hesitation

Confirmed CIQ should proceed with the Dieter RESF restructure plan, overriding Greg's expressed concern that the restructure doc might disrupt RESF's current momentum under Leigh. Bjorn aligned with Peter. Greg deferred rather than blocking.

Apr 9

Agent IQ: Requiring Bjorn to Justify Before Supporting

Peter directed that Bjorn must articulate how Agent IQ augments CIQ's portfolio before it gets engineering resources. Not killing the project outright but requiring strategic justification.

AI/Data Security Audit Commitment to Greg

When Greg raised concerns about CIQ leaking data through AI agents/bots/services, Peter committed to getting Michelle's oversight team to do an assessment/audit of what's running and with what access.

Michael Young Termination Communication Approach

Peter set communication boundaries for Michael Young's termination: don't tell RESF people WHY, only 'we decided to part ways.' Advised Greg not to write specifics down. Declined to reply to Michael directly.

Empower Dieter as RESF Infrastructure Lead + Stock Grant

Peter decided to push Greg to give Dieter formal authority as RESF technical infrastructure lead, and approved a stock grant for Dieter with Bjorn's support to tie him more closely to CIQ.

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

Established Fuzzball AI validation process

Committed to validating Greg's Fuzzball AI marketing claims before they go external. New process: Greg/Jonathan provides desired story, Peter documents engineering tests required, engineering validates and gives thumbs-up/down. HumanX conference in 2 weeks is the forcing function.

Mar 25

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

RESF — Orchestrated demand-pull approach for CIQ help

Directed that CIQ help should come through RESF team requests (especially Taylor/Sherif) rather than being imposed from above. Reinforced 'CIQ will help if you ask' messaging through Greg and Leigh. Wants RESF work driven like a project with visibility into requests.

Mar 24

RESF — Deliberately accepted engineering capacity hit for RESF support

Explicitly committed to accepting CIQ engineering disruption from RESF support work. Stated he'd be 'upset' if there isn't impact on engineering — signaling this is the right priority trade-off and meaningful work should be happening.

Mar 24

RESF — Committed CIQ resources (Dieter/Nathan) and proposed tech lead structure

Committed Dieter and Nathan to near-full-time RESF work. Proposed Dieter as RESF tech lead reporting to Peter for ~1 year. Told Leigh both are available immediately (Dieter now, Nathan when back from vacation). Scheduled Tuesday alignment meeting with Greg/Bjorn/Max to formalize structure and authority. Briefed Max on strategy: unified front with Bjorn, carrots and sticks approach for Greg meeting.

Mar 24

Fuzzball SaaS Prepaid Token Billing Model with Unified Portal Backend

Drove adoption of prepaid token ('CIQ Tokens') billing model for Fuzzball SaaS MVP, with unified Portal backend as single source of truth for all user accounts and token balances. Free tier deferred to fast-follow. MVP requires account + credit card to run workflows.

Mar 21

Gate Fuzzball SaaS GTM on Working Prototype — Assign Michelle

Agreed to move forward on Fuzzball SaaS GTM but gated it on having a working prototype first. Suggested Michelle as the resource to stand up a prototype on top of existing Fuzzball, accepting she's not the ideal person but can make progress. Rejected doing it 'out of band' — keep in normal product flow.

Mar 21

Personally Invest in Retaining Mustafa at RESF

Proactively reached out to Mustafa, scheduled a 1:1 for Monday March 23 at 9:30am PST. Shared outreach in #distinguished-leaders and declared 'I will invest HARD in the good ones.' Providing executive-level support to counter harassment from Taylor and Sharif.

Mar 21

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

Google Deal — Engineering Owns Resource Projection

Directed that engineering (not finance/biz dev) should own projecting what the Google deal requires in terms of team size and capacity. Participated in Google Deal review meeting where consolidated $6M/yr development fee proposal was developed, including engineering guardrails (live patching scope limits, early renewal trigger). Deal structure: $6M dev fee for 5-7 senior engineers, uncapped variable usage fees (removing $1M cap), 15-25% margin on premium listings + MDF, early renewal trigger if scope exceeds funded team capacity.

Mar 18

RESF Communication & Information Control Strategy

Established multi-layered communication control for RESF transition: (1) Posted own #engineering message with different language than Greg's draft, emphasizing visibility requirement. (2) Told eng-management nobody talks on RESF Zoom calls because RESF members can hear. (3) Asked Lindsay to confirm no social media leaks. (4) Told Max to keep RESF off Department Heads agenda Thursday.

Mar 18

RESF Operational Framework — CIQ Resources Work Under RESF Direction

Established and communicated to entire engineering org that all CIQ work for RESF must be done 100% at RESF direction, with every request flagged for Peter's visibility. Reinforced individually with Ryan (get accounting of in-flight work, ensure RESF person directing), Nathan (hold then green-light Taylor contact with specific messaging), and Mustafa (offer resources under RESF direction, recommend MatterMost for coordination).

Mar 18

Louis — No Acting Role for Next Couple Years

Decided Louis cannot have any acting role in RESF for the next couple of years. Technical contributions may be allowed later by whoever runs RESF. Priority is not muddying the transition message.

Mar 13

Excluded Brian from RESF Pre-Transition Planning

Decided to exclude Brian from pre-transition RESF planning based on synthesizing risk signals from multiple sources. Brian's role will be carefully managed post-transition.

Mar 13

RESF Monday Cutover — Finalized 3 PM PT Execution Plan

Finalized the RESF infrastructure cutover plan for Monday March 16 at 3 PM PT, including DNS NS record flip, AWS VPC firewalling, account disabling (Lewis, Neal), and security audit — accepting up to 24 hours of DNS-related downtime.

Mar 13

Enforcing Product Process for Greg's RLCAI Requirements

Enforcing the correct process by directing all of Greg's RLCAI requirements to the Product team rather than allowing Greg to bypass Product and give direct requirements to Engineering. Brian Dawson raised the concern; Peter is supporting and enforcing.

Mar 11

Asset Management — Backend-First, Bridge to Views

Advocated for deciding where the asset management backend should live first, then building bridges to expose it wherever needed (Jira, Rippling). Explicitly disagreed with Greg's framing that building bridges adds unnecessary complexity.

Mar 11

Brian Clemens — Loop In After Front Door Closes

Decided Brian Clemens should be brought into RESF matters only after the front door is closed, acknowledging he'll be critical for reconstruction but the current phase requires operational security. Conditional on his behavior: 'If he hasn't gone off the reservation at that point.'

Mar 11

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

Prioritize GPU Optimization to Define Team Capability Needs

Directed that GPU utilization optimization be prioritized for Fuzzball/RLC AI, using the priority as a diagnostic to reveal what in-house capabilities the team needs.

Mar 8

Prioritize Google Exec Meeting — Adjust Reno Travel

Agreed to meet a confidential new Google executive (distinguished engineer from Google Cloud, came through Tissa) for Monday dinner or Thursday lunch. Thursday option requires returning from Reno Wednesday night. Directed Greg to cover Toyota in person on Wednesday if needed.

Mar 6

RESF Option A — CIQ-Led Transition with Narrative Reframing

Adopted Option A (CIQ-led transition) as the only viable path for RESF. Reframed narrative for Greg as 'skeleton' foundation for future vibrant community, not 'threadbare' end state. End-state vision: Rocky Linux displaces Alma and Ubuntu as de facto enterprise OS. Identified critical leadership gap requiring new empowered leader ('mystic unicorn') deputized by remaining board. Internal story: 1-year transition to 501(c)(6).

Mar 5

Push for Continuous Sales/Support Enablement

Aligned with Greg on pushing for continuous product enablement (demos, walkthroughs) for Sales and Support on every new engineering feature, overriding Bjorn's resistance. Peter committed to re-engaging Bjorn on this.

Mar 4

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

Aligned with Max on RESF Option A (Skeleton Independent) as the best path

After reading Max's RESF decision framework document ('The Future of the RESF: A Decision Framework for CIQ'), Peter agreed with Max that Option A — maintaining the RESF as an independent entity in the lightest possible form with one CIQ-employed full-time RESF leader — is the best path. This is Peter's position alignment with Max, not yet a company decision. Next step is presenting to Bjorn and Greg for buy-in.

Mar 3

Aligned with Max on RESF Option A (Skeleton Independent) as the best path

Mar 3

Demanded measurable success criteria for LinuxLM project

Greg proposed training/fine-tuning a Linux-expert foundation LLM (LinuxLM). Peter pushed back by demanding explicit success criteria — deployment plan, evaluation methodology, and clear value proposition — before endorsing the project.

Mar 3

Decided to carefully surface Icicle results to Bjorn

After validating Icicle test methodology with Ryan (BIOS change applied before both with/without comparisons — apples-to-apples), and learning Ani was told by Bjorn to stand down on Icicle, Peter decided to personally and carefully bring the validated results to Bjorn's attention.

Feb 27

Set NVIDIA positioning: benchmarks are AMD-only, offer to collaborate on tuning

Defined strategic positioning for NVIDIA benchmark situation: frame existing benchmarks as AMD-only, and offer to work with NVIDIA to tune Rocky Linux for their platform. This turns a potential embarrassment into a partnership opportunity.

Feb 25

Approved retention check-in strategy for must-keep employee list

Approved the must-keep employee list prepared by Mariah and Chris. Committed to personally leading retention check-ins with must-keep engineering employees. Bjorn leads check-ins for his org. Mariah and Chris excluded their own teams (already monitored closely).

Feb 25

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

Initiated proactive top performer temperature checks

After Ian Kaneshiro's resignation, Peter directed the senior leadership group in #distinguished-leaders to split up and individually meet with top performers to take their temperature. This is a systematic retention check rather than just crisis management for the single departure.

Feb 24

Escalated Ian Kaneshiro retention to CEO level

After learning Ian Kaneshiro (PIC team, reports to Chris Wolford) resigned to join an AI startup, Peter immediately directed a retention escalation: told Mariah to get Greg talking to Ian, told Greg to do anything to keep him. After learning Ian had already accepted and wouldn't go back on it, shifted to ensuring the door stays open for a future return.

Feb 24

Commit to benchmark accuracy sign-off by tomorrow

Committed to signing off on the accuracy of the RLC-AI benchmark document by Feb 21, gating its release. Greg conditioned approval on numbers being '100% accurate' and verifiable. Bjorn shared both internal and external draft documents for review.

Feb 20

Assign Max as RLC-AI benchmarking plan owner with RHEL comparisons

Assigned Max Spevack as owner of the RLC-AI benchmarking plan in response to Greg's question about ownership. Directed that RHEL comparisons be added to exit criteria. Bjorn owns product definition (what to benchmark), Max owns technical execution (how to benchmark accurately). Max will create a one-page methodology document for the Humane pitch.

Feb 20

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

Pushed for March ARR review, rejected April as too late

Directed Sarah and Greg to schedule an ARR targets review meeting in March, pushing back on an April date as too late. Wants to ensure the company is on track for revenue targets and can pivot anything needed. Offered personal availability and said format doesn't matter.

Feb 20

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

Leveraged TPS report visibility to drive accountability with Justin

Proactively messaged Justin that the Release All Things section of the TPS report looks bad, with a 2.5-hour deadline before C-Suite Sync presentation. Gave Justin a window to update Jira tickets to reflect reality.

Feb 12

Core42 Technical Assessment - Multi-Product Positioning in UAE

Attended Core42 meeting in Abu Dhabi with Greg, Bjorn, Max, and Adam Jackson. Provided real-time technical assessment to the team via Slack, identifying product-customer fit across four CIQ product lines: RLC-H for defense customers (CVE remediation pain), Rocky as guest OS on Signature Cloud, Fuzzball as potential replacement for their unhappy AI cloud orchestration partner, and Ascender Pro for their heavy Ansible usage. Followed up personally with Raghu (EVP Engineering, Core42 US) offering in-person meetings.

Feb 9

Approved RLC+ and Pro product hierarchy with new naming and de-risked launch cadence

Approved a new product hierarchy: Stock Rocky (pure community mirror), RLC+ (free with NVIDIA/AMD drivers), RLC Pro (paid tiers). The RLC name now signifies CIQ value-add. Also approved a de-risked 3-phase launch cadence: Phase 1 (Feb) bundles RLC Pro + RLC Plus NVIDIA; Phase 2 (Feb) RLC Pro AI; Phase 3 (Mar) RLC Plus AMD partnership. Identified backporting vs roll-forward policy gap as a pre-launch blocker.

Feb 6

Enforced Product-owns-prioritization process with Greg

Pushed back directly on Greg when he tried to route engineering work outside the established prioritization process. Insisted Product owns the priority list and work requests must flow through the proper channel. Simultaneously reminded Chris Baek that his team owns signoff authority and should use it rather than escalating through Greg.

Feb 6

Google Partnership Strategy - Build Rapport with Tissa

Decided to shift the Google contract renegotiation strategy from confrontational to collaborative. Peter will personally meet with Tissa (Google) to build rapport and empathy, framing CIQ's financial pain as a shared problem to solve together. Greg will be excluded from this meeting to ensure a non-antagonistic conversation.

Feb 5

RESF Strategy: Remove Lewis with Legal Leverage, Engage Neil Collaboratively

Approved plan to remove Luis (Lewis) from the RESF board using a Quinn Emanuel memo documenting a potential federal law violation and breach of fiduciary duty, then send a collaborative letter to Neil offering a path forward to avoid a public fight. Greg will present the memo to board members to secure their support. Shadow infrastructure (Koji, clones) is confirmed ready.

Feb 4

AI-First PR Process - Tests Over Human Review

Decided that PR process should evolve to prioritize automated test suites over human code review for AI-generated code. If a comprehensive test suite passes, the code is considered production-ready regardless of its origin.

Feb 3

New Engineering Mandate - 2x Velocity in 6 Months

Set new mandate for Justin and Nathan: top priority is building a team that can deliver twice as fast in six months. This is a shift from the previous coaching model to a performance-driven one - setting ambitious targets, holding people accountable, and replacing underperformers.

Feb 3

CODE2 Values Redefinition - From Traits to Behaviors

Proposed redefining CIQ CODE2 values from character traits (what people are) to observable behaviors (what people do). Created comprehensive framework translating each value (Customer Centric, Optimistic, Dedicated, Efficient, Excellent) into concrete, measurable actions for engineering. Shared draft with Bjorn first for alignment, then presented to Greg in 1:1.

Feb 3

Advocate for in-person Anduril POC kickoff in Seattle

Decided to advocate for an in-person technical kickoff meeting in Seattle for the Anduril POC, with both Peter and Max attending. Set clear boundaries on duration - a day or two is fine, but two weeks would break February delivery dates.

Jan 31

Recommend partial bounty payout for Fuzzball single-binary work

Recommended paying out half of the originally established bounty to the team members who completed the Fuzzball single-binary work. Want to use bounties as a repeatable, low-friction model across engineering and ensure all of engineering knows about the payout.

Jan 31

RESF crisis comms - single source of truth

In a RESF crisis, publish one official blog post as the central source of truth. All responses on social media (Hacker News, LWN, HPC forums) link back to that post. Do not engage in real-time debates. Own the traditional news cycle, not social media.

Jan 30

Escalated Visa support model concerns to Greg

Escalated concerns about CIQ support arrangement with Visa to Greg and Bjorn. Questioning why CIQ is on the hook to support Rocky Linux (which CIQ does not build) for Visa, rather than having Visa use RLC so CIQ can actually fix their issues.

Jan 30

Clarified bonus evaluation framework - above and beyond for step-function impact

Clarified to Steve Wallace that bonuses are awarded for actions that are above and beyond standard role expectations and provide a step function for CIQ - not for standard job performance, which is covered by salary. Also confirmed TJ bonus (Greg approved Jan 23 via private DM) and committed to close the loop with Greg.

Jan 30

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

Advocated for PIC team progress to Greg

Reported to Greg (CEO) about satisfaction with Chris Wolford team improvement and transparency. Thanked Greg for going into PIC Demos meeting with open mind despite having strong opinions. Highlighted Ian Kaneshiro as fantastic.

Jan 28

Performance review redesign - define traits with observable behaviors

Committed to drafting a proposal to fix the performance review system for the April/May cycle. The approach keeps existing traits but defines each with observable behaviors so managers and employees have shared understanding of what success looks like.

Jan 28

Committed to ensuring Greg technical direction reaches Justin

Committed to redirecting Justin to follow Greg architectural guidance on object storage/depot, and to be the conduit ensuring Greg technical direction reaches engineering clearly. Greg flagged that depot work was not in line with past directives.

Jan 26

Approved Greg-Cedric engagement starting Monday

Approved Greg beginning conversations with Cedric on Monday to provide context on upcoming PIC work. Cedric will continue participating in epic scoping sessions to stay connected to the tactical work.

Jan 23

Instituted ARR and CVE gap metrics visibility at weekly meetings

Decided to communicate both current ARR (as determined by finance) and CVE gap metrics at weekly meetings. Proactively communicated this to Bjorn and Greg, anticipating potential concerns but proceeding anyway.

Jan 22

Engineering dates commitment by Friday - reprioritize for revenue impact

Committed to publishing updated engineering dates/milestones by Friday for Monday group review. Acknowledged January deliverables are unrealistic - many items were newly added and cannot complete in remaining ~10 days. Will reprioritize toward revenue-impacting items first. Tomorrow all-day session with Chris Baek to rework H1 plan into aggressive but achievable targets.

Jan 21

Board presentation narrative: AI as lean maintenance enabler

Finalized board presentation framing AI as the solution to lean, automated maintenance org. Key talking points: heavy AI usage across engineering, all builds automated with zero public issues in 3 months, leaning out maintenance to free devs for RLC-AI/H, RESF contingency infrastructure (3 heads, 5 weeks), CVE automation story (net-snmp 40-day p50 to 14 days), expectation to reduce manual CVE team by 75% in 6 months.

Jan 19

All-Hands messaging: acknowledge Q4 miss, pivot to pipeline optimism

Aligned with leadership on All-Hands messaging strategy: directly acknowledge Q4 revenue miss, then pivot to optimistic outlook highlighting $22M H1 pipeline and unified GTM plan. Peter to present tech updates (service endpoints, Nerf) and guide Mural board walkthrough. No naming specific deals to avoid premature expectations.

Jan 17

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

Strategic Map Framework - Value Drivers vs Internal Efficiency Separation

Established new H1 strategic planning framework that separates customer-facing Value Drivers from Internal Efficiency Drivers. Framework uses three lanes: middle lane for Value Drivers (the WHY), top lane for GTM activities, bottom lane for engineering deliverables. Also established phased estimation process: low-confidence ballpark dates first, then engineering-only session to raise confidence.

Jan 15

Justin Coaching - Ambiguity Tolerance and Explicit Pushback

Coached Justin on the Depot/Portal bounty disconnect. Addressed two issues: (1) Justin needs to get comfortable moving through ambiguity and letting his team explore before designs are fully baked - unlearning 10 years of Amazon training. (2) When Peter pushes for something, Justin needs to either do it or explicitly debate/push back - not quietly not execute.

Jan 12

Marketing ICP Validation - Collaborative Research Approach

Pushed for marketing to validate ICPs with real data rather than just executing on what was decided in the planning room. Established that ICPs are hypotheses to test, not fixed targets, and Lindsay has permission to explore outside defined ICPs if data warrants.

Jan 12

H1 Planning Framework - 3-Lane Model

Pushed for the team to focus on ICPs, goals, and milestones rather than getting lost in metrics and mid-level tactics. Established a 3-lane framework (GTM, Value Drivers, Engineering) to align all work.

Jan 12

Verify Justin Offered Bounty Work Broadly

Investigating whether Justin followed direction to offer bounty work opportunities to everyone. Greg believes it was not offered to Westley. Peter committed to verify this week.

Jan 11

Friday Layoff List Finalized

Finalized the layoff list for Friday Jan 9: Eli, Derek, Chris Short, Craig, and Trinity. Jason deferred due to ISO certification needs.

Jan 6

Commitment to Present Engineering-to-GTM Messaging Framework

Committed to presenting a framework next week that ties engineering work to changes in market state and corresponding go-to-market messaging. Triggered by Fuzzball Service Endpoints press release that was 98% HPC-focused, missing the critical AI angle despite AI being the strategic priority.

Jan 2

Advocate for Ryan's Strategic Seat

Committed to securing Ryan Smith a seat at the strategic decision-making table for RESF/Rocky Linux matters. Specifically promised to advocate for his inclusion in key meetings with Bjorn and Greg.

Dec 31

RESF Management Model Needed

Identified that RESF needs a clear management person or model as part of short-term response. The lord of the flies approach does not work. Does not matter if its Leigh or someone else, as long as they have personal energy/bandwidth. But it needs to be managed/run with clear accountability.

Dec 29

Sensitive Decision

Sensitive

RESF Infrastructure Independence - Technical Execution

Directed Nathan to mirror all RESF repositories and initiated build environment duplication. Created #internal-resf-escalation channel with strict confidentiality rules. Keeping technical circle small (Nathan, Max, Justin, Dieter) while moving quickly.

Dec 24

RESF Crisis Response - Infrastructure Independence

After learning of hostile plans by RESF board members (Louis, Neil, Brian Clemens) to publicly attack CIQ, dismantle Rocky Linux infrastructure, and damage the project, initiated emergency response to replicate RESF infrastructure for Rocky 8, 9, 10 with minimal team awareness.

Dec 23

Planning RESF Relationship Improvement Strategy

Initiated planning meeting with Greg and Bjorn to address concerns about RESF function and plan improvements to the relationship

Dec 22