RESF — Orchestrated demand-pull approach for CIQ help
Situation
Directed that CIQ help should come through RESF team requests (especially Taylor/Sherif) rather than being imposed from above. Reinforced 'CIQ will help if you ask' messaging through Greg and Leigh. Wants RESF work driven like a project with visibility into requests.
Reasoning
Solving a political problem, not just a resource problem. Taylor and Sherif have been complaining about CIQ coming in uninvited — pushing more resources in would reinforce their narrative and create resistance. Getting them to request help neutralizes the 'CIQ takeover' complaint, creates ownership (they asked, so they can't resist), builds a paper trail that RESF invited CIQ involvement, and sets the political foundation for Tuesday's formal structure meeting.
Additional Context
Greg wanted to push help through Leigh immediately. Peter redirected — prefers it come from Taylor/Sherif themselves. Groundwork already laid: Dieter engaged, Leigh aware, Mustafa coached. This is about getting political alignment right before Tuesday's formal meeting with Greg/Bjorn/Max.
Observed Evidence
Peter told Greg: 'I would almost prefer it come from Taylor/Sherif... because they are the ones who have been complaining about CIQ coming in un-asked.' Also: 'For now I just need them to keep getting CIQ will help if you ask messaging reinforced.' And: 'I just want to ensure the work on the RESF side is being driven like a project.' Told Leigh resources are available and to request freely.
Confidence Breakdown
Reasoning Depth Analysis
People Involved
Source
reflection
AI Confidence
67%
Related Context
slack
I don't mind where it comes from. I would almost prefer it come from Taylor/Sherif... because they are the ones who have been complaining about CIQ coming in un-asked.
slack
For now I just need them to keep getting 'CIQ will help if you ask' messaging reinforced.
slack
For now I just want to make sure you have the resources available to keep things moving and improving there at the RESF.
Outcome
No outcome recorded yet.
Decision ID: 739603fe-580c-4429-a588-fc190876f854