Willing to pull C3 into engineering, gated on Product confirming it is a priority
Situation
In his 1:1 with Art Tyde, Peter said he is willing to pull C3 into his engineering org, conditional on Product (Bjorn) actually confirming it is a priority. C3 ownership is currently ambiguous (Peter was told Greg owns it, which he called a terrible answer, and nobody under Peter owns it), it is degraded (reported ~50 percent down, Fathom-approximate), and it is blocking a Huawei evaluation. Peter made a note to figure out who is responsible for keeping it up and how to fix that.
Reasoning
Confirmed by Peter. He is willing to resolve an ownership vacuum but will not spend engineering capacity on a degraded orphan speculatively - Product must declare it matters first. Gating on a Product priority signal is his standard discipline: capacity follows stated priority, not ad-hoc pull, and it protects eng from inheriting a system nobody has committed to resourcing.
Additional Context
C3 degraded and blocking a Huawei eval; nominal ownership sits with Greg today, nobody under Peter owns it. C3 downtime figure (~50 percent) is Fathom-approximate.
Observed Evidence
Peter: I am happy pulling it in. I just need product to actually say they care. / I made a note to figure out who is keeping it up... and how we fix that.
Matching Patterns
Confidence Breakdown
Reasoning Depth Analysis
People Involved
Source
reflection
AI Confidence
61%
Related Context
fathom
The last time I asked who owned it, the answer was Greg, which is a terrible answer. But it is nobody under me. So I am happy pulling it in. I just need product to actually say they care. I made a note to figure out who is keeping it up or who is supposed to keep it up and how we fix that.
Outcome
No outcome recorded yet.
Decision ID: 331ce07a-1219-4a7b-911c-3696c89c0b64