Sarah Almaraz

Dec 19, 2025 - Mar 6, 2026

13

Decisions

0

Active Todos

7

Patterns

Decisions (13)

Prioritize Google Exec Meeting — Adjust Reno Travel

Agreed to meet a confidential new Google executive (distinguished engineer from Google Cloud, came through Tissa) for Monday dinner or Thursday lunch. Thursday option requires returning from Reno Wednesday night. Directed Greg to cover Toyota in person on Wednesday if needed.

Mar 6
strategy

Committed to RESF day-of execution planning meeting next week

Committed in #internal-resf-escalation to organizing a meeting next week to build an execution plan for the RESF day-of lockdown. Directed Sarah to invite Nathan, Max, Justin, and Dieter. Bjorn is finishing messaging drafts this weekend, so technical execution planning must be ready to match the communication track.

Feb 27
operational

Pushed for March ARR review, rejected April as too late

Directed Sarah and Greg to schedule an ARR targets review meeting in March, pushing back on an April date as too late. Wants to ensure the company is on track for revenue targets and can pivot anything needed. Offered personal availability and said format doesn't matter.

Feb 20
strategy

Shared Mini-Me delegate access with Bjorn for collaborative todo management

Gave Bjorn delegate access to Mini-Me web app so he can see Peter's todo list, enabling collaborative work on shared priorities during Dubai travel week. Walked him through the limited view and how it works. Also instructed Bjorn to have Sarah coordinate with Moody for Google/Slack permissions setup for a new person.

Feb 8
operational

Value Drivers document cannot be automated from Jira - fills a gap Jira lacks

Clarified that the Value Drivers Release Plan document cannot be automated from Jira. The document was created specifically to fill a gap in Jira - linking engineering deliverables to GTM deliverables around WHY certain work is being done. Since Jira does not contain this linkage data, automating from Jira would just reproduce the gap.

Jan 21
operational

NVIDIA partnership scope agreed - CIQ Rocky Linux for NVIDIA AI at GTC

Agreed with Scott Hara on NVIDIA partnership deliverable: CIQ will deliver a free CIQ Rocky Linux for NVIDIA AI (with AI patches + NVIDIA drivers) for GTC showcase in ~8 weeks. No requirement to upstream to community Rocky short-term. Support cadence: 1-2h kickoff Q&A, then 3 weekly 1h sessions, then ad hoc. CIQ maintains distro with minimal NVIDIA intervention; NVIDIA supplies patches, system access, and optimization guidance.

Jan 21
strategy

Estimation philosophy: move dates early, hold them late

Project dates should be moved when new information is learned, rather than just dropping confidence when dates pass. Early SWAG dates should be updated once actual scoping begins. Red patterns in dashboards reflect engineers being trained not to move goalposts - this needs to change.

Jan 19
operational

All-Hands messaging: acknowledge Q4 miss, pivot to pipeline optimism

Aligned with leadership on All-Hands messaging strategy: directly acknowledge Q4 revenue miss, then pivot to optimistic outlook highlighting $22M H1 pipeline and unified GTM plan. Peter to present tech updates (service endpoints, Nerf) and guide Mural board walkthrough. No naming specific deals to avoid premature expectations.

Jan 17
strategy

Ali Contract Termination Executed

Sent termination email to Ali Erdinç Köroğlu on Jan 5 after missed Dec 31 sync meeting and other missed meetings. Coordinated with Mariah (HR) and Sarah to cancel calendar invites and deactivate systems.

Jan 6
people

Friday Layoff List Finalized

Finalized the layoff list for Friday Jan 9: Eli, Derek, Chris Short, Craig, and Trinity. Jason deferred due to ISO certification needs.

Jan 6
people

AI Bot Architecture Decision

Decided to build a web app to front the AI bot, allowing curated outputs to be shared with Sarah and others without granting direct data access to underlying Slack/email/Jira data.

Dec 28
technical

RLC 9.7 Launch Path Decision

Participated in RLC 9.7 Launch planning meeting to decide path forward on release and rework priorities.

Dec 19
technical

Championing AI Butler Internal Adoption

Hosted and recorded the AI Dashboard/Butler setup session to drive internal adoption of Claude-based personal productivity tools across CIQ. Shared personal use case of creating meeting prep notes from Slack/email/docs.

Dec 19
operational

Related Patterns (7)

Executive Sponsorship for Strategic Partnerships

Strategic cross-company initiatives and major client partnerships require executive-level accountability to move at the right pace and ensure proper prioritization.

77 occurrences75% success

Small Circle for Sensitive Operations

When executing sensitive strategic operations, keep the circle of informed people as small as possible to prevent leaks that could accelerate hostile action or undermine the initiative.

74 occurrences74% success

Protect Engineering Capacity

When external demands threaten to overload engineering capacity, protect capacity by either requiring the demand to come with additional resources, or forcing hard prioritization choices upstream.

60 occurrences79% success

Accountability Follow-Through

When you issue a warning or mandate with stated consequences, you follow through. Warnings are not threats - they are commitments. The credibility of future accountability depends on following through now.

59 occurrences86% success

Lead by Example with New Tools

When championing new tools or processes, personally use them and share results rather than just advocating. Learning by doing and demonstrating value through example is more effective than mandates.

57 occurrences52% success

Protect Engineering Focus Through Process

When faced with requests that would disrupt engineering focus (from sales, governance, product, or other stakeholders), establish processes that protect engineering ability to innovate while still satisfying legitimate concerns. Prefer systematic solutions over ad-hoc responses.

55 occurrences48% success

Pragmatic Technical Middle Ground

When facing competing concerns (security vs innovation, access vs protection), find technical solutions that satisfy multiple stakeholders rather than debating policy or picking sides.

1 occurrences