Cedric

Jan 23, 2026 - May 27, 2026

6

Decisions

0

Active Todos

6

Patterns

Decisions (6)

Cedric placed full-time on Gregs research team; Kyle still pending Gregs conversation

After the C-Suite Sync surfaced the Kyle/Cedric risk asymmetry (Kyle = low performer needing hard deadlines, Cedric = high-output engineer well-suited for rapid POCs), the research-team assignment from yesterday flipped: Cedric is now the firm full-time mover to Gregs research org, while Kyles move is still open and gated on Greg-owned conversation + Kyle finishing his RLC commitments first. The Wolford backfill rec opens regardless of which one moves.

May 27
people

Kyle conditional move to Greg AI role gated by filling Wolfords rec first; Cedric written off the Fuzzball team

Kyle reached out to Greg directly about the AI role reporting into Greg. Peter aligned with Greg and Chris Wolford on the following: (a) Kyle stays in Wolfords org through end of June while the new tickets land; (b) Wolford receives Gregs open rec immediately and starts hiring; (c) Kyle does not move until that rec is filled; (d) Kyle is told this is a job change, not a trial — if it does not work in Gregs world he is out, same as any other role mismatch; (e) Peter will tell Greg that Cedric is NOT meaningfully delivering on Fuzzball today (he is a part-time advisor at best while building for Greg), and Wolford will plan as if Cedric does not exist on the team going forward.

May 26
people

Shaped Interview Panel with Veto Condition for Performance Engineering Hire

When Greg wanted to add Cedric to the interview panel and reduce from 5 to 4 interviewers, agreed Bjorn could be dropped but set a condition: a NO from Max or Peter must count as a veto.

Apr 11
people

Set Lab-to-Production Boundary — Nothing Ships Without Engineering Productization

Established with Bjorn that nothing from Greg's Innovation Group/Lab (Cedric) goes directly to production. Everything must pass through Engineering for productization, validation, and integration with build/signing pipelines. CIQ does nothing with RLC-Performant until the lab produces something viable.

Apr 11
strategy

AI-First PR Process - Tests Over Human Review

Decided that PR process should evolve to prioritize automated test suites over human code review for AI-generated code. If a comprehensive test suite passes, the code is considered production-ready regardless of its origin.

Feb 3
technical

Approved Greg-Cedric engagement starting Monday

Approved Greg beginning conversations with Cedric on Monday to provide context on upcoming PIC work. Cedric will continue participating in epic scoping sessions to stay connected to the tactical work.

Jan 23
operational

Related Patterns (6)

Executive Sponsorship for Strategic Partnerships

Strategic cross-company initiatives and major client partnerships require executive-level accountability to move at the right pace and ensure proper prioritization.

139 occurrences79% success

Small Circle for Sensitive Operations

When executing sensitive strategic operations, keep the circle of informed people as small as possible to prevent leaks that could accelerate hostile action or undermine the initiative.

136 occurrences79% success

Proactive Talent Pipeline Investment

Invest in building leadership bench and talent relationships before there is an urgent need. Use proven relationships from past experience to create optionality.

131 occurrences73% success

Accountability Follow-Through

When you issue a warning or mandate with stated consequences, you follow through. Warnings are not threats - they are commitments. The credibility of future accountability depends on following through now.

129 occurrences73% success

Protect Engineering Capacity

When external demands threaten to overload engineering capacity, protect capacity by either requiring the demand to come with additional resources, or forcing hard prioritization choices upstream.

122 occurrences80% success

Three-Lever Talent Management

When pursuing a velocity or performance mandate, simultaneously operate on all three talent levers — upgrade (hire better), retain (protect key people), and exit (remove blockers) — rather than sequentially. This creates compounding momentum: exits free capacity for upgrades, retention preserves institutional knowledge during transitions, and upgrades raise the performance bar that justifies further exits.

89 occurrences74% success