Technical Decisions

11 recent decisions

AMD RLC Plus Strategy: Speed-to-Market with Minimal Scope

Feb 4, 2026 · technical · high90% confidence

Decided to prioritize speed-to-market for the RLC Plus AMD co-marketing launch. The initial build will use upstream AMD packages (pre-built ROCm), the kernel driver (not upstream DKMS), and enable EPEL. Deferring the more robust in-house rebuild until market traction is proven. Justin Haynes to draft proposal and decision matrix.

People: Justin Haynes, Nathan Blackham, Brady Dibble, Brian Dawson, Peter Nelson

5/5

AI-First PR Process - Tests Over Human Review

Feb 3, 2026 · technical · medium85% confidence

Decided that PR process should evolve to prioritize automated test suites over human code review for AI-generated code. If a comprehensive test suite passes, the code is considered production-ready regardless of its origin.

People: Greg Kurtzer, Cedric

4/5

Project Shackleton - RESF contingency infrastructure

Jan 30, 2026 · technical · medium95% confidence

Build a parallel mirror of all RESF infrastructure in AWS (Git repos, Koji, vault/pub, Mattermost history) with goal of restoring Rocky Linux builds within two weeks if Lewis triggers his kill switch. Everything built with CDK and Ansible for repeatable deployment.

People: Nathan Blackham, Dieter, Peter Nelson, Max Spevack

3/5

PR standards in AI era - own the test suite, not the code

Jan 30, 2026 · technical · medium88% confidence

In an AI-enabled world, engineers should own the test suite and exit criteria, not necessarily every line of code. Quality comes from tests passing, not from reading every line. Engineer accountability shifts from I wrote this code to I own that this code passes these tests.

People: Max Spevack, Nathan Blackham, Justin, Peter Nelson

Closed

CVE automation architecture - simple state machine, 1 CVE per commit

Jan 30, 2026 · technical · high92% confidence

CVE automation should be built as a simple state machine with clear exit criteria at each step. Each commit addresses exactly one CVE. The orchestrator should be stupid-simple - just moving between states. Steps: Research -> Rebase -> Build -> Test -> MR -> Final Build -> Integration Test -> Promote to Beta -> Integration Test -> Production.

People: Max Spevack, Nathan Blackham, Justin Haynes, David Gomez

Closed

Approved proceeding with x86 RESF shadow infrastructure first

Jan 22, 2026 · technical · medium80% confidence

Approved Jonathan Dieter proceeding with the RESF shadow infrastructure build using x86 architecture first, deferring non-x86 builders (S390X, RISC-V, PPC64LE) to address later. The 4-week MVP timeline is feasible for x86.

People: Jonathan Dieter

Closed

Koji Build System Priority - RESF Risk Mitigation

Jan 13, 2026 · technical · high75% confidence

Directed Nathan to prioritize Koji cluster standup with Dieter. Goal is to have independent build infrastructure in place so CIQ is not dependent on RESF. Asked for timeline if this became top priority, and indicated Dieter should reprioritize accordingly.

People: Nathan Blackham, Dieter

3/5

Partner/User Management Tech Debt - Accept for Speed

Jan 12, 2026 · technical · medium95% confidence

Explicitly acknowledged and accepted that Partner Portal, Fuzzball SaaS, and Portal Depot will have separate user/account systems rather than integrating them. Flagged the future cleanup cost but chose speed over architectural purity.

People: Lindsay Aamodt, Tabatha, Dave Dickerson, Ramesh

4/5

CVE Strategy - Eventually Consistent Model

Dec 29, 2025 · technical · high78% confidence

Aligned with Max on new approach to CVE patching: adopt an eventually consistent model that prioritizes rapid patching over perfect upfront testing. Accept a small error rate (e.g., 5%) as a necessary trade-off for speed, with fixes handled by COE.

People: Max Spevack, Nathan Blackham, Jeff Uphoff, David Gomez

4/5

AI Bot Architecture Decision

Dec 28, 2025 · technical · medium73% confidence

Decided to build a web app to front the AI bot, allowing curated outputs to be shared with Sarah and others without granting direct data access to underlying Slack/email/Jira data.

People: Stephen Moody, Sarah Almaraz

5/5

CVE Remediation - Direct Intervention Required

Dec 24, 2025 · technical · high79% confidence

Identified unacceptable lack of urgency from Nathan team on NARF-created CVEs. Will take direct action to address performance issues next week.

People: Nathan Blackham, Max Spevack, Brady Dibble

3/5