AI/Data Security Audit Commitment to Greg
Situation
When Greg raised concerns about CIQ leaking data through AI agents/bots/services, Peter committed to getting Michelle's oversight team to do an assessment/audit of what's running and with what access.
Reasoning
Acknowledged Greg's concern as valid without being defensive. Immediately identified the right existing team (Michelle, Moody, Baek). Redirected Greg's Fuzzball question appropriately — oversight team handles security/access, not product strategy.
Additional Context
Greg raised this proactively, not in response to a known incident. Comes amid heavy AI adoption across CIQ including autobot, mini-me, and various other tools. Steve's team just flagged TJ's AI-powered Autobot in #hey-pete-look.
Observed Evidence
Peter acknowledged Greg's data leaking concern: 'We should.' Identified existing oversight team. Committed: 'I'll get the request in front of Michelle.' Redirected Greg's Fuzzball endpoint question: 'Good question but may not be for that group to answer.'
Matching Patterns
Confidence Breakdown
Reasoning Depth Analysis
Related Context
slack
We should. There's a team being run by Michelle and Moody and Baek to provide oversight.
slack
I'll get the request in front of Michelle.
Outcome
No outcome recorded yet.
Decision ID: ba80e78b-28f5-4bf0-bfe4-90f5f59a7fbd