RESF Operational Security — Compartmentalize Until Board Action
Situation
Directed that Brian must not be told anything until after the RESF board notification. Emphasized extreme caution about leaks to Lewis. Approved Joseph being read into the initiative but warned about leak risk. Sequenced information flow: board action first, then notifications, then credential recovery.
Reasoning
Brian has RESF infrastructure credentials needed post-cutover, but early alerting could trigger defensive actions. Lewis is a known risk who could undermine the initiative if he learns prematurely. Board notification creates the legal cover — nothing should happen before that formal action. Each additional person who knows increases leak probability, and the consequences at this stage are catastrophic to the entire initiative.
Additional Context
MPDM with technical leads. Joseph newly read into RESF. War room channel active. DNS swap planned as minute-1 action, credential recovery as post-cutover process.
Observed Evidence
Direct quote: 'We do not tell Brian anything till after the board notification.' Second direct quote: 'he should not be involved and is not part of taking a snapshot.' Fathom summary confirms leak caution regarding Lewis and Joseph. Slack #temp-fser shows sequenced credential recovery plan.
Matching Patterns
Confidence Breakdown
Reasoning Depth Analysis
People Involved
Source
reflection
AI Confidence
94%
Related Context
slack
We do not tell Brian anything till after the board notification.
fathom
Peter reiterated the need for extreme caution to prevent leaks to Lewis
Outcome
No outcome recorded yet.
Decision ID: f6fe34ed-d362-43b9-be37-7c7aba1fc543