Committed to engineering date hygiene confrontation with directs

Situation

Peter publicly committed in Leadership Roundtable to holding a tough conversation with his directs about deliverable date hygiene. Requested date-slip magnitude data from Chris Baek (days vs weeks) to focus on significant delays rather than minor variance.

Reasoning

TPS report continues to show multiple items with date slips — CLK 6.18 overdue 4 days, Nathan Blackham items slipping 28-30 days without confidence updates, Justin Haynes items slipping 7-24 days. This escalates from awareness (58% miss rate identified in Apr 10 reflection) to direct accountability conversation. Requesting magnitude data shows fairness — distinguishing acceptable variance from systemic failures. Public commitment in Leadership Roundtable adds accountability to follow through.

Additional Context

Follows the Apr 10 reflection where 58% estimation miss rate was surfaced. Board meeting today makes delivery credibility especially important. Engineering Weekly Sync rescheduled to ensure Nathan's attendance for JIRA data accuracy discussion.

Observed Evidence

Fathom recording of Leadership Roundtable captures Peter's commitment to the confrontation. Requested specific data (magnitude of date slips) from Chris Baek before the meeting. TPS report corroborates: multiple items with significant date slips across Nathan's and Justin's teams.

Matching Patterns

Confidence Breakdown

Reasoning Depth Analysis