Clarified bonus evaluation framework - above and beyond for step-function impact

Situation

Clarified to Steve Wallace that bonuses are awarded for actions that are above and beyond standard role expectations and provide a step function for CIQ - not for standard job performance, which is covered by salary. Also confirmed TJ bonus (Greg approved Jan 23 via private DM) and committed to close the loop with Greg.

Reasoning

Steve needed guidance on how to evaluate bonus requests - the criteria were not clear to him. Distinguishing above and beyond / step function from good job performance creates a consistent, defensible framework. The TJ bonus situation revealed a communication gap (Greg approved via private DM but Steve did not know) - closing the loop prevents similar confusion.

Additional Context

TJ had done work that Steve believed warranted a bonus. Greg had already approved on Jan 23 via private Slack message to Peter, but Steve was unaware. This conversation both clarified the framework and resolved the specific TJ situation.

Observed Evidence

From Fathom meeting: Steve was unclear on TJ bonus status. Peter explained bonus criteria (above and beyond, step function impact) vs salary (standard performance). Confirmed Greg had approved TJ bonus on Jan 23 via private Slack. Peter committed to ask Greg to finalize.

Matching Patterns

Confidence Breakdown

Reasoning Depth Analysis