Restructure the Tuesday staff meeting to org-by-org TPS ownership and un-fork the TPS report to one shared source

Situation

Peter is firmly changing how he runs his Tuesday staff meeting: instead of Peter walking the team through the TPS report, each org owner presents their own section and owns that part of the meeting. He also committed to un-fork his drifted TPS report back to a single shared report, visible to everyone three days ahead.

Reasoning

This applies the ownership and accountability doctrine (release owners, Value Drivers Board) to his own meeting: making each leader present their status forces them to own the narrative and the dates rather than Peter being the single person who reads status to them - the same why-is-Nathan-not-telling-this-story concern from his Max notes. Un-forking to one shared report visible three days ahead removes the drift and single-source-of-truth problem and pre-empts the post-deadline date-change pattern he keeps flagging - everyone stares at the same numbers before the room.

Additional Context

Confirmed by Peter as a firm change. Medium importance.

Observed Evidence

Direct quotes in Max 1:1; reinforced by skipping the stale TPS review in Engineering Weekly in favor of the Value Drivers Board.

Matching Patterns

Confidence Breakdown

Reasoning Depth Analysis