Coordinated Google Post-Mortem Alignment Between Nathan and Bjorn
Situation
Ensured Nathan's Google post-mortem document was reviewed by Bjorn before sending to Google, because Bjorn has a Thursday call about contract changes and the doc could undermine his asks.
Reasoning
Nathan's technical post-mortem and Bjorn's commercial conversation with Google are happening in the same window — uncoordinated outbound comms to the same counterparty could create confusion or undermine negotiating position. Peter is the connector between engineering and product/commercial tracks of the Google relationship. Protecting CIQ's external credibility — one voice to the customer.
Additional Context
Consistent with recent Google decisions: Unified Google Proposal (3/4), Prioritize Google Exec Meeting (3/6). Nathan wanted to send tonight; Bjorn's call is Thursday — narrow alignment window.
Observed Evidence
Two separate DMs: To Nathan: 'Bjorn is talking to them... thursday? about contract changes. so we should ensure his conversation and your doc align.' To Bjorn: 'Here's a post mortem doc that Nathan wants to send to GCE folks tonight. Wanted you to have a chance to see it before he sends in case it screws any of your asks of them.' Max was also involved in rewriting/polishing the doc.
Confidence Breakdown
Reasoning Depth Analysis
Related Context
slack
Bjorn is talking to them... thursday? about contract changes. so we should ensure his conversation and your doc align.
slack
Here's a post mortem doc that Nathan wants to send to GCE folks tonight. Wanted you to have a chance to see it before he sends in case it screws any of your asks of them.
Outcome
No outcome recorded yet.
Decision ID: cc708366-4245-4a6e-bbd4-6b766e8610bb