Fuzzball PoC ownership belongs to Sales Engineering, supported by Engineering
Situation
When Bjorn asked who should own Fuzzball PoCs (Sales Engineering vs Wolfgang/Godlove vs Support), Peter answered definitively: Sales Engineering, supported by Engineering. Bjorn agreed with the framing — pushback was strictly about Sales Engineering not being enabled on Fuzzball today (resourcing gap), not the principle. The default routing stands.
Reasoning
Default placement for any product-customer-facing PoC is the SE function — that is what SE is built for. Engineering is a backstop, not the front line. SE-not-enabled-on-Fuzzball is a capability gap to close (via enablement), not a routing problem to work around (by permanently rerouting to Wolfgang or Engineering). Hold the org-design line so the gap surfaces and gets resourced, rather than papering over it.
Additional Context
Surfaced in #department-heads Apr 23 — Bjorn explicitly tagged Ramesh Srinivasan and Peter to align on Fuzzball PoC ownership. Peter answered tersely (was about to fly to Germany). Bjorn's response ("SE not enabled on fuzzball... fine with SE owning it mid term... may need to be Wolfgang [near term]") confirms theoretical agreement plus a near-term resourcing gap.
Observed Evidence
Direct quote from Peter Apr 23 16:08 PDT in #department-heads. Bjorn confirmed agreement on framing in same thread, raised resourcing concern only. User confirmed theory is uncontested.
Matching Patterns
Confidence Breakdown
Reasoning Depth Analysis
People Involved
Source
reflection
AI Confidence
78%
Related Context
slack
I think it's squarely Sales Engineering, supported by engineering.
Outcome
No outcome recorded yet.
Decision ID: 68dea295-5b29-4d0f-99c9-f8ad5884d97f