Desktop - all investment behind one opinionated desktop; stock upstream GNOME ships only as a zero-investment bridge for 10.2 and Everfox
Situation
Peter told Greg (10/20) and then Bjorn and Brady (10/21) that CIQ will not build two opinionated, fantastic desktops. GNOME ships straight from upstream for 10.2 and the January Everfox timeframe, with only the tweaks needed for the Everfox required applications - nothing that changes functionality and nothing that needs separate support. All desktop investment goes into one opinionated desktop; Cosmic is only a placeholder, and which desktop it is belongs to Product. End state is dropping GNOME or pointing at upstream unchanged.
Reasoning
Greg heard do both as two perpetual, fully invested variants - the multi-desktop failure mode Linux distros have hit for decades. Peter separated shipping GNOME (near-free from upstream) from investing in it (zero), so Everfox gets a desktop in January without splitting the strategy. The choice of opinionated desktop is deliberately left to Product; the engineering stake is one arrow, not which arrow.
Additional Context
Refines the 10/13 decision that enterprise GNOME and an AI desktop ship together: GNOME is a bridge with an exit, not a co-equal product. Greg flagged that GNOME must then be supported for the rest of the 10.x release. Thursday 8am meeting with Bjorn and Brady is the next decision point.
Observed Evidence
Desktop call: You need to convince the product org (re Cosmic). Slack 10/21: GNome comes straight from upstream with whatever tweaks needed for Everfox required applications; the goal is one day we drop GNome entirely.
Matching Patterns
Confidence Breakdown
Reasoning Depth Analysis
People Involved
Source
reflection
AI Confidence
81%
Related Context
fathom
I want all of our resources behind one arrow, and only one arrow. I am willing to let it be a non-Gnome arrow, and ship Gnome straight from upstream, and do nothing else with it.
slack
at no point are we working to make two variants opinionated and fantastic. As long as we are focused as I am describing, Greg is fine.
Outcome
No outcome recorded yet.
Decision ID: 4eac0a8c-f7f4-417d-a049-c1c02cf74a58