Push for Continuous Sales/Support Enablement
Situation
Aligned with Greg on pushing for continuous product enablement (demos, walkthroughs) for Sales and Support on every new engineering feature, overriding Bjorn's resistance. Peter committed to re-engaging Bjorn on this.
Reasoning
Greg's 1:1 feedback survey showed 'weak sales enablement' as a top employee theme — this is data-driven. Bjorn's resistance likely stems from his own learning style (reads and absorbs quickly) which isn't universal across Sales/Support staff. Enablement is the bridge between engineering output and revenue — without it, features ship but sales can't sell them. Aligning with Greg first gives Peter CEO backing before approaching Bjorn.
Additional Context
Greg conducting 1:1s with all employees. Initial findings show optimism (4.1/5) exceeds satisfaction (3.9/5). Top feedback themes: brand gap (Rocky vs CIQ), slow marketing workflows, weak sales enablement. Dave Horn's 2/5 score reflects real past negative experience with previous sales team. Justin Haynes noted as more technically capable than his communication style suggests.
Observed Evidence
Fathom summary from Greg 1:1 shows clear Peter+Greg alignment on enablement strategy vs Bjorn resistance. Employee survey data validates the need. Explicit Fathom action item assigned to Peter: 'Align w/ Bjorn on post-completion support/sales enablement; then implement demos/walkthroughs.'
Matching Patterns
Confidence Breakdown
Reasoning Depth Analysis
Related Context
fathom
Peter & Gregory advocate for continuous enablement (demos, walkthroughs) for Sales and Support on every new engineering feature. Bjorn resists due to perceived overhead.
fathom
Weak Sales Enablement: Inconsistent product knowledge and poor training — top feedback theme from employee 1:1s.
Outcome
No outcome recorded yet.
Decision ID: 33348023-d5ef-4520-be7e-0e9b9cf50406