Dave Dickerson

Dec 24, 2025 - Jun 18, 2026

7

Decisions

0

Active Todos

6

Patterns

Decisions (7)

Veeam CVE-escalation response: tell the honest intentional-tradeoff story, diagnose via Dickerson first

Ahead of a 5 AM Monday call with Veeam on a roughly 1M deal Bjorn flagged as at-risk, Peter set the response strategy. Tell Veeam the honest story: CIQ made an intentional trade-off (criticals 9-plus, known-exploit CVEs, and high-8s are handled; behind on some low-7s) because it is investing in CVE automation to handle the coming flood, and this is NOT a reaction to being caught. Step one is to reach out to Dickerson first to learn Veeams actual expectations and what specifically unblocks their signature. Nathan owns the technical scanner-nuance explanation (stack-protection downgrades, scanners scoring off non-Red-Hat CVEs).

Jun 18
strategy

Ship CIQ kernel patch with extra fix; contribute upstream; race to be first/best on CVE response

Linux kernel CVE response: CIQ shipping 10 fixes vs CentOS Stream's 9 (CIQ found and is fixing an extra issue related to the CVE). Extra commit submitted upstream to centos-stream and acknowledged for inclusion. CIQ pushing to be first EL distro to release, with primary goal of customer reassurance and secondary goal of public proof point that CIQ contributes to security and is large enough to serve big customers. Also pushing patches to RLC kernels as fallback in case RH doesn't move quickly.

May 1
strategy

Custom Engineering Scoping Process — Nathan as Gate

Established formal process for unplanned custom engineering requests from sales: Nathan provides quick effort estimate (days/weeks/months), enabling formal prioritization. Nathan can say no, escalation goes to Peter.

Mar 6
operational

New Engineering Mandate - 2x Velocity in 6 Months

Set new mandate for Justin and Nathan: top priority is building a team that can deliver twice as fast in six months. This is a shift from the previous coaching model to a performance-driven one - setting ambitious targets, holding people accountable, and replacing underperformers.

Feb 3
strategy

Everfox partnership requires ARR-target-level contract to proceed

Participated in technical scoping meeting with Everfox to understand feasibility of supporting their RHEL 8 to RHEL 10 migration for 100k+ hardened thin client units. Meeting was exploratory - no commitment made.

Jan 29
strategy

Partner/User Management Tech Debt - Accept for Speed

Explicitly acknowledged and accepted that Partner Portal, Fuzzball SaaS, and Portal Depot will have separate user/account systems rather than integrating them. Flagged the future cleanup cost but chose speed over architectural purity.

Jan 12
technical

ProServe Work Prioritization Process

Established new process for handling professional services work: ProServe work will be prioritized against existing roadmap, not by dropping in-flight work. Product (Brady) owns prioritization decision, Engineering determines timing based on capacity.

Dec 24
operational

Related Patterns (6)

Executive Sponsorship for Strategic Partnerships

Strategic cross-company initiatives and major client partnerships require executive-level accountability to move at the right pace and ensure proper prioritization.

139 occurrences79% success

Small Circle for Sensitive Operations

When executing sensitive strategic operations, keep the circle of informed people as small as possible to prevent leaks that could accelerate hostile action or undermine the initiative.

136 occurrences79% success

Protect Engineering Capacity

When external demands threaten to overload engineering capacity, protect capacity by either requiring the demand to come with additional resources, or forcing hard prioritization choices upstream.

122 occurrences80% success

Lead by Example with New Tools

When championing new tools or processes, personally use them and share results rather than just advocating. Learning by doing and demonstrating value through example is more effective than mandates.

118 occurrences78% success

Protect Engineering Focus Through Process

When faced with requests that would disrupt engineering focus (from sales, governance, product, or other stakeholders), establish processes that protect engineering ability to innovate while still satisfying legitimate concerns. Prefer systematic solutions over ad-hoc responses.

116 occurrences77% success

Conscious Tech Debt for Execution Speed

When facing time pressure, explicitly acknowledge and accept technical debt rather than blocking progress. The key is making the trade-off consciously and visibly so it can be addressed later.

1 occurrences