Sign off on the Fuzzball/Stratum strategy doc while reserving one right - shape the UX so there is one unified experience regardless of what underpins the cluster
Situation
After the 10/30 alignment meeting, Peter skimmed the Fuzzball/Stratum doc while away and gave written sign-off: nominally aligned, no concerns. He reserved the ability to get into the weeds on UX later - how installation options are presented and how admin panels evolve based on what is installed - so there is one unified experience regardless of what underpins the cluster.
Reasoning
The doc matched the 10/23 direction (one identity, one pane of glass, Engineering owns the developer experience), so holding the group for a full review added nothing. Sign off on the architecture and keep the single lever that matters: judge the outcome by whether the experience is unified. Sets the standard rather than approving details.
Additional Context
Related to keeping Stratum out of the IRIS deployment the next night: the rearchitecture is why a large deployment now would bake in the wrong shape.
Observed Evidence
Skimmed the doc; nominally aligned; no concerns; reserve UX - installation options and admin panels evolving with what is installed; one unified experience regardless of underpinning; take this as my sign off.
Confidence Breakdown
Reasoning Depth Analysis
Related Context
slack
I am nominally aligned and do not have concerns. I would like the ability to get into the weeds on the UX eventually... one unified experience regardless of what is underpinning the cluster. Please take this note as my sign off.
Outcome
No outcome recorded yet.
Decision ID: deeb1560-78d2-4a65-921b-7a5a164241cb