Hold the margin line - willing to walk from bad-economics deals (currently applied to Rakuten)
Situation
In his 1:1 with Baek, Peter articulated a generalized stance and named its current target: stop playing the tell-the-customer-yes-to-anything game, and hold a hard line even if it means losing the deal. He will not spend 2M to capture 400K. He confirmed this is a generalized principle that at this moment absolutely applies to Rakuten as those negotiations finalize.
Reasoning
Margin discipline over top-line vanity: a deal that costs more to serve than it returns is a net drain regardless of logo value. Saying yes to everything erodes the engineering org and trains customers and sales to expect unlimited scope. Better to lose a bad-economics deal cleanly than win it and absorb a structural commitment the team cannot staff.
Additional Context
Confirmed by Peter as a generalized stance currently applied to Rakuten as negotiations finalize. The 6/17 internal sync covered two CentOS-extended-support pricing scenarios for Rakuten; the RFQ response was due around Thursday 6/18.
Observed Evidence
Direct quote in Baek 1:1; Peter confirmed it is a generalized stance currently applying to Rakuten.
Confidence Breakdown
Reasoning Depth Analysis
Related Context
fathom
we are still playing the game of tell the customer yes to anything they ask for... that is just going to kill us. So trying to hold a hard line on like a Rakuten deal, even if it means we lose it. I do not want to spend 2 million to get 400,000.
Outcome
No outcome recorded yet.
Decision ID: ac51d100-be2e-48f2-b39c-926367c6fdbb