Approve the Spark benchmark claim in the RLC Pro AI press release - correct and defensible beats preferred wording

Situation

Lindsay asked Peter to confirm the final RLC Pro AI on DGX Spark benchmarks (Dawson had confirmed; Bjorn routed her to Peter). Peter confirmed them, noted they are not yet published on Spark Arena, and approved the first-paragraph claim: comfortable with it, does not love the wording, but it is correct and defensible. Separately told Bjorn the word four is doing a lot of lifting since there are many more tests than four.

Reasoning

Peter gates public claims on defensibility rather than phrasing, and leaves marketing wording to marketing once the claim is accurate. Consistent with not announcing what Engineering cannot stand behind. The Arena submission is still blocked on account approval, so the release rests on CIQ own runs.

Additional Context

Spark Arena: local runs on stock RLC Pro AI 9 would place first on four leaderboard tests across two models; submission waiting on Andrew Arena account approval, Dawson chasing.

Observed Evidence

Direct approval in Lindsay DM; benchmark confirmation; caveat to Bjorn on four.

Confidence Breakdown

Reasoning Depth Analysis