Approve Jason Rodriguez performance exit path

February 20, 2026 at 6:56 PMpeoplehigh

Situation

Approved Nathan's plan to tell Jason Rodriguez he's 'not meeting expectations' and create an exit path. A 1-month exit plan is acceptable if Jason agrees. Performance gaps include missed deadlines (shim review for Rocky 9 late, Rocky 7 review pending) and unshippable code (large PR unlikely to pass review).

Reasoning

Continuation of the accountability approach set at the Jan 30 leadership offsite. Original plan was to set clear deliverables and evaluate - now the evidence is in. Missed deadlines and unshippable code provide clear justification. Complementary to the hiring decisions (Ben and Jamin) - exit underperformer, bring in higher-caliber talent. Nathan owns the conversation; Peter approves the approach and clears the path.

Additional Context

Existing todo from Jan 30: 'Follow up on Jason Rodriguez evaluation approach with Nathan.' Dieter flagged Jason's struggles with recent changes. Max previously expressed skepticism about Jason's ability to deliver. Ben and Jamin hiring creates replacement pipeline.

Observed Evidence

Fathom Nathan 1:1: Jason struggling with recent changes (noted by Dieter). Missed deadlines: shim review for Rocky 9 late, Rocky 7 review still pending. Unshippable code: large PR unlikely to pass review. Nathan will use 'not meeting expectations' in next 1:1. 1-month exit plan acceptable if Jason agrees.

Matching Patterns

30%
Accountability Follow-Through(same category (people), following through on evaluation set at offsite)
30%
Proactive Talent Pipeline Investment(same category (people), creating space for higher-caliber talent)

Confidence Breakdown

28/35
Evidence
10/30
Pattern
15/20
Source
5/15
Corroboration

Reasoning Depth Analysis

Org Signal:Performance standards are real and have consequences. CIQ is raising the bar on engineering quality.
Who Affected:Nathan's team sees accountability in action. Ben and Jamin get slots. Dieter flagged the issues initially.
Precedent:Reinforces the accountability culture shift from the leadership offsite. First concrete exit following the new standards.
Consequences:Jason exits, creating space for stronger talent. Team morale may improve or be shaken depending on how it's handled.
Timing:Now because evidence is clear (missed deadlines, unshippable code) and replacement candidates (Ben, Jamin) are available.

Source

reflection

AI Confidence

58%

Related Context

🎥
Nathan <> Peter Weekly 1:1

fathom

Nathan will address Jason's performance directly, using the phrase 'not meeting expectations' to create an exit path. This move aims to make space for higher-caliber talent.

Outcome

No outcome recorded yet.

Decision ID: 6054d1de-bbe6-465a-8108-d9f57d898872