Core42 partner posture - plan only in CIQ-only rooms, never program-manage Core42, zero friction, Adam coordinates
Situation
During the Core42 deployment Peter set operating rules: all CIQ planning and coordination happens in CIQ-only rooms, not the shared WhatsApp group; CIQ does not program-manage Core42 work (the network work is theirs); zero friction for two weeks - asking where to look for updates is fine, pinning people down for updates is not; Core42 should experience CIQ as the easiest partner in the world; Adam Jackson owns ensuring the right CIQ people are on each Core42 call and requests elsewhere route through him; visibility comes through documents (HLD/LLD) and introductions to their networking owners rather than chasing.
Reasoning
Core42 wants to pull the date in; CIQ leverage is goodwill, and any appearance of managing them risks the relationship and the larger cluster upside. Shared rooms expose CIQ internal churn to the customer. A single coordinator fixes the missed-call failure of 10/7-10/8, framed forward-looking rather than as blame.
Additional Context
Confirmed by Peter as stated.
Observed Evidence
mpdm to Duane/Chris Baek 10/8; core42 channel 10/8 Adam as coordinator; Fathom 10/9 easiest partner; Fathom 10/8 HLD/LLD visibility.
Matching Patterns
Confidence Breakdown
Reasoning Depth Analysis
Related Context
slack
We cannot program manage the work being done by Core42. Our planning and coordination needs to be done 100% in rooms that are just CIQ. 0 friction.
slack
I would like Adam to own ensuring all the right people are on it... I am not litigating the past.
fathom
make them feel like we are the easiest partner in the world to work with
Outcome
No outcome recorded yet.
Decision ID: 1b68140f-3dc4-4f75-8ed5-38c416a6d04a